One of the most important tasks of neuroscientists is to conduct research. Research is necessary for understanding how the nervous system functions. Without research there would be no progression forward in the understanding of information throughout the scientific community, which would severely inhibit our understanding of how humans function. Research is conducted constantly in the neuroscience community and is shown by conducting experiments and collecting data to write up as a published research study for other members of the scientific community to view and conduct additional experiments from. Once this evidence is published among neuroscientists, other members of the scientific discourse community can determine the validity of the data. This can be determined by testing the repeatability of the results of the experiment. If the experiment is deemed repeatable, then it can be considered a valid finding and the data can be seen as proof of the tested hypothesis. To maintain consistency of organization within the scientific community, articles are organized in the way of a typical scientific research study. They typically begin with an introduction followed by an explanation of methods and then a discussion of the results. Because of this universal layout, information can be distributed within the neuroscience discourse community in a consistent and logical way.
Example of elements of a typically organized research study:
The entire article these examples are taken from can be found here.
Click the following topics below to learn more about their influence in the field of Neuroscience:
Emily Merewether: What is a World View? 